|
NAVIGATE
OPINION
|
WARNING: what you're seeing could be far from the truth
At first, I thought those questions were easy to answer. Actually, the two words have been used interchangeably, to mean the same thing, in this web site up-to-now. Yet, the truth is that "image" and "picture" don't have, necessarily, the same meaning. It depends on the standpoint we assume when giving an answer. In a general (broad) sense, both of these words are synonyms, signifying: a (visual) "representation" of something outside of its own. In a more specific sense, some differences show up. For instance, look at the definitions offered by the Merriam Webster Dictionary (http://www.m-w.com):
We don't need to carefully examine each definition to get to the point we want to assume (after all, that's what it is). Both entries include notions that apply to the graphical works visitors see in this web site (as well as in many others, fractal-related or not), but the latter one is more akin to our purpose. Why? An "image" is a reproduction or imitation of something, a copy as similar or accurate as posible to the original entity. When we look at ourselves in the mirror, we see an image of ourselves (what a surprise!). A "picture", on the other hand, is also a reproduction of something, but it doesn't require to be an imitation. More specifically, that representation could be elaborated, highly decorated, or even altered or modified in many ways. As if when we look at ourselves in a mirror, instead of getting back an image of how we look like at that exact moment, we magically see ourselves from the inside out (muscles and skeleton in dripping blood), wearing another garment (no matter what age or epoch it is), or standing in a fantastic environment (with gnomes or aliens, it's up to you). But maybe that idea is still too "imaginative." There is a simple element in the second definition that is the point we really want to emphasize (the main idea behind the beclouded example above): a paint. The nearest we want to get (or the farthest we want to goit depends on your point of view) in this web site is to claim that what you are viewing are but fractal pictures, and not absolute representations of pure fractals, which certainly is not our aim. So, when viewing this web site's content, don't assume what you're seeing are real fractals, or as we have been discussing, fractal IMAGES. That should be the objective of a web site interested in fractals as mathematical entities (and there are many out there). In FRACTOVIA, on the other hand, assumptions should end: what you're actually viewing is a collection of fractal PICTURES, possibly highly altered or too far away from their mathematical reality (or even closer than expectedwho knows). We intend no more. Juan Luis Martínez
first version: 2001.11.03 current (third) revision: 2003.09.14 DISCLAIMER HOW TO CONTACT US... |